Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Author: bplr

August undefined, 2024

WebApr 12, 2024 · The Supreme Court (SC) of India has held that mere belated TDS remittance won’t attract a penalty under section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. M/s US Technologies, the appellant challenged the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in confirming the levy of interest/penalty under … WebApr 11, 2013 · Section 271C. If any person fails to deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B then, such person shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of tax which such person failed to deduct or pay as aforesaid.This penalty is imposable by Joint Commissioner.

Section 271C applies to both failure to deduct and pay TDS - TaxG…

WebFeb 2, 2024 · Applicability of provisions of section 271C of Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty under section 271C is applicable under the following conditions –. The person fails to deduct, the whole or part of, tax at source (i.e. TDS). The person fails to pay, the whole … WebApr 11, 2024 · The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the penalty is not leviable in absence of proper show cause notice to the assessee.. Zile Singh … small tooth chip repair

No Penalty For Failure To Deduct Tax At Source If Assessee ... - Mondaq

WebAug 3, 2024 · The plain reading of section 271 (1) (c) of Income Tax act 1961 clearly states as follows “Concealment of particulars of income or fringe benefits or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income or fringe benefits” and levies penalty of minimum 100% as a fine and maximum 300% of tax sought to be evaded in addition to tax payable. WebNote : No penalty is imposable for any failure under sections 271 (1) ( b), 271A, 271AA, 271B, 271BA, 271BB, 271C, 271CA, 271D, 271E, 271F, 271FA, 271FAB, 271FB, 271G, 271GA, 271GB, 271H, 271-I, 272A (1) ( c) or ( d ), 272A (2), 272AA (1), 272B, 272BB (1), 272BB (1A), 272BBB (1), 273 (1) (b), 273 (2) (b) and 273 (2) (c) if the person or assessee … WebApr 12, 2024 · On 09.10.2003, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax issued a show cause notice proposing to levy a penalty under Section 271C of the amount equal to TDS. The High Court vide impugned judgment and order has dismissed the appeal preferred by the assessee by holding that failure to deduct/remit the TDS would attract a penalty under … highwayman motel masterton

Annual Increment earned by Govt Servant for Past period can

Mere delay in remittance of TDS doesn’t attract penalty u/s 271C …

WebAug 6, 2024 · Show Cause Notice for penalty under section 271 (1) (c) of the Income-tax Act,1961 Ms/Mr/M/s, Faceless Penalty Scheme was launched on 12/01/2024 and henceforth all penalties will be disposed of in a faceless manner similar to Faceless Assessment. 2. WebNov 11, 2014 · However, the AO did not find merit in the submissions of the assessee and levied penalty U/S 271C of the Act vide order dt. 18th Aug., 2010. Being aggrieved, the … small tools texture packWebSep 7, 2024 · 3.Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Rs.4,60,000 was levied vide order dated 26/04/2024. ... In the given case, the Departmental appeal is on the interpretation of section 275 of the … highwayman pub rhoose parking

"WebApr 13, 2024 · The Supreme Court in this case was considering whether the appellant was liable for penalty u/s 271C even though there was mere delay in payment as the provisions of Section 271C dealt with penalty for failure to deduct the tax and not delayed payment of tax. The court accepting the arguments of the Appellant’s AR that the penal provisions ... " - Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Income tax penalty u/s 271c

No Penalty For Failure To Deduct Tax At Source If Assessee

WebApr 12, 2024 · Even the CBDT has decided to impose no penalty under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction of TDS, and no penalty is contemplated under Section 271C for delayed remittance, payment, or deposit of the TDS. The court stated, asserting the CBDT’s Circular No. 551 dated January 23, 1998. The assessee was not required to pay … WebIncome Tax - Levy of penalty u/s 271C - delay in deposit of Tax deducted at source (TDS) - Section 271C(1)(a) shall be applicable in case of a failure on the part of ...

Did you know?

Web1. confirming penalty of Rs.1,81,00,765 u/s. 271C of I. T. Act, 1961. 2. confirming the above penalty on the ground that the eventhough the appellant had claimed that the parties to whom payments were made had paid the taxes whereever applicable in their individual capacity, the appellant had not submitted any documents in support of the same. WebSection 271C (1): (a) deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B; or. (b) pay the whole or any part of the tax as required by or …

WebAug 3, 2024 · The plain reading of section 271 (1) (c) of Income Tax act 1961 clearly states as follows “Concealment of particulars of income or fringe benefits or furnishing of … WebIncome Tax Penalty u/s 271C - failure on the part of the assessee to deduct tax at source - without declaring the assessee as assessee in default under section 201(1) no penalty …

Web1 day ago · The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and a notice under section 143(2) was served on the assessee on 22.09.2016. The Assessing Officer(AO) passed assessment order u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.1 The AO has levied penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act. Aggrieved by the penalty order the Assessee had filed appeal … WebThe minimum amount of penalty levied is 100% and the maximum amount of penalty levied is 300% of the amount of tax sought to be evaded. The income is generally assessed …

WebApr 12, 2024 · Supreme Court Held. The Supreme Court held that section 271C (1) (a) is applicable in case of a failure on the part of the assessee to “deduct” the whole or any part of the tax as required under the provisions of the Act. The words used in Section 271C (1) (a) are very clear, and the relevant words used are “fails to deduct.”.

WebApr 10, 2024 · On 02.06.2003, Income Tax Officer (ITO) vide order under Section 201(1A) of the Act, 1961 levied penal interest of Rs. 4,97,920/for the period of delay in remittance of TDS. On 09.10.2003, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax issued a show cause notice proposing to levy penalty under Section 271C of the amount equal to TDS. highwayman pub shenstoneWebJun 30, 2016 · “Issue penalty notice u/s 221 and 271C and 272A (2) (c) & 272A (2) (k) of I.T. Act, 1961 are being issued separately for each & every such default for all the years involved.” Thus, the Assessing Officer, during the course of passing of order u/s 201 (1) & 201 (1A), directed for issue of penalty notice u/s 271C. small tooth clipartWebPenalty U/s. 271C Of Income Tax Act Cannot Be Levied For Delay In Remittance Of TDS Already Deducted By Assessee- SC. 11 Apr 2024 11:17:58 highwayman pub rhooseWebAug 1, 2024 · A penalty is levied under Section 271 (1) (c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 if the assessee has concealed the particulars of his income or furnishes inaccurate particulars of income. Explanation 1 defines what constitutes concealment of income. highwayman poem lyricsWebApr 10, 2024 · In all the cases, the Income Tax Officer (ITO) vide order under Section 201 (1A) of the Act levied penal interest for the period of delay in remittance of TDS. Further, … small tooth cavity treatmentWebMar 24, 2009 · In fact in the orders passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, they have been mentioning “Initiate Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1) (C) of the I T Act” by default on additions/disallowances done without providing any reasons irrespective of whether the assessee really tried to conceal his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of his ... highwayman rhoose facebookWebMar 16, 2009 · 16 March 2009 Please note that penalty under both these sections can not be imposed at the same time. Difference between both these sections are as below: 1. … small tooth dog publishing group